대여금등
1. The Defendant’s KRW 195,838,580 as well as 20% per annum from April 11, 2015 to September 30, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On November 10, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the vicarious execution of a rearrangement project to establish a promotion committee for the establishment of a rearrangement project association (hereinafter referred to as “instant agency contract”) with the chairman of the promotion committee for the establishment of a rearrangement project association in a zone A (tentative name) zone B (hereinafter referred to as “the promotion committee”).
The purpose of this case's agency contract is to provide (tentative name) services, such as preparing basic data on rearrangement projects, vicarious execution of administrative affairs, and demanding written consent for the establishment of the promotion committee, to the (tentative name) promotion committee, and to lend business expenses, personnel expenses, etc. to the promotion committee.
B. After the amendment of Articles 69(1)7 and 73(2)2-2 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, the Plaintiff and (tentative name) Promotion Committee agreed on the instant agency contract on June 25, 2010.
At the time (tentative name) B, the president of the Promotion Committee (tentatively named) settled loans and business support funds borrowed from the Plaintiff on the agreed date and issued a loan certificate, and repaid within 14 days after approval for establishment of the Promotion Committee and the selection of the specialized maintenance business operator, but the final repayment date was decided until December 2010.
B At the time, the settlement statement stating KRW 61,613,580, KRW 64,225,00, KRW 20,000, KRW 10,000, office rent deposit amount, KRW 10,000, KRW 30,000, KRW 30,000, such as house, etc., and KRW 195,838,580, such as site and head office management fee of KRW 30,00,00 (hereinafter referred to as “the settlement statement of this case”).
C. The Defendant obtained authorization to establish an association on March 23, 2012.
On June 4, 2012, the board of representatives of the defendant, on June 2, 2012, stated the same details and amount as the instant settlement statement as the "project cost (tentatively named)" item, with respect to the current status of the project cost of the promotion committee, it obtains the approval of the general meeting of the association members regarding the project cost related to the promotion committee until the defendant's establishment.