When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2014. 4. 30. 03:45경 광주 광산구 B에 있는 피해자 C(여, 53세)이 경영하는 ‘D’ 식당에서, 해장국을 먹다가 뼛조각이 치아에 끼어 피가 났다.

이에 화가 난 피고인은 피해자에게 “야 씹할 년아, 왜 음식에 뼛조각이 들어있냐” 라는 등 욕설을 하면서 양손으로 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고 주먹으로 얼굴부위를 수차례 때리고 머리채를 잡아 흔드는 등 폭행하였다.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a 14-day therapy, a part of the right shoulder, a diversatory typryp, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Optional fine;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act appears to be against the Defendant’s crime of this case. However, in light of the fact that the Defendant endeavored to recover the victim’s damage, the Defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime in the past, the amount of fine determined by the summary order cannot be deemed to be imposed.