2. In the case of this case, the victim suffered injury by the victim because the defendant invadedd the central line and invaded the news, and caused injury to the victims. In particular, in the case of the victim C, the victim suffered injury requiring approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment due to the accident of this case, the center line was invaded during driving, the defendant's negligence was serious, and the victims suffered significant pain due to the accident of this case. Nevertheless, the victims did not agree with some victims and did not receive suspicion from them, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions of the defendant's age, family relation, past offense relation, sex, environment, means and method of the crime, motive and method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., when comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions of the defendant's age, family relation, and other sentencing conditions of the defendant's age, family relation, sex behavior, environment, motive and method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., are considered, and thus, it is not determined as unfair because it is too unreasonable to the extent that the sentence imposed by the court below should be reversed.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.