For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court acquitted the Defendants on the grounds that there was no proof of a crime with regard to the special larceny portion regarding “(2,400 square meters prior to W, 90 square meters prior to W, 190 square meters, 69.53 square meters prior to W, 2,400 square meters prior to X-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, and 1,706 square meters prior toY),” among the facts charged against the Defendants, and “6-7 square meters prior to a real estate sales contract (the sales contract as of December 27, 2008, and the sales contract as of January 9, 2009)” among the facts charged against the Defendants.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the above determination by the court below is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, thereby exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.