A. The sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination factors are favorable sentencing factors, such as the fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime, that the defendant is aged as the disabled of class 3 with physical disability, that there is no serious criminal record, and that the female sex trafficking has been seen.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is an unfavorable sentencing factor, such as the fact that the crime of this case was committed by using women who lack intellectual ability to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic, and that the defendant has been sentenced to the same fine and four times.

In full view of various sentencing conditions, including various circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, criminal record, criminal record, method of crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed to be too weak or unreasonable.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.