When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around November 21, 2014, the Defendant ordered 17-year acid and Mariju, etc. to the victim U, a business owner of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (T) at the main point of “T” on November 7, 2014, notwithstanding that he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she was placed in the order of alcohol, etc.

The Defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to the same amount of money by being provided with alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 206,00 in total from the victim, and by not paying the amount of money after being provided with alcoholic beverages in excess of KRW 206,00 from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the police of U;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on simple receipts;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;