횡령및부당이득금
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasons for the explanation of this case by the party member of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) whether Defendant C comprehensively takes charge of the Plaintiff’s business; (b) whether Defendant C received the delivery order from the Plaintiff’s customer or the non-transaction office from the Plaintiff; and (c) if received, it is insufficient to recognize whether Defendant C directly or through the “N company” intended to deliver the pertinent delivery order; and (d) it is insufficient to recognize whether Defendant C withdraws KRW 17,217,800 from the Plaintiff’s passbook, and therefore, it is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding “it is insufficient to recognize whether Defendant C voluntarily or through the non-transaction office withdraws KRW 17,217,800 from the Plaintiff’s passbook.”
2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance shall be delivered with this conclusion, and all appeals against the defendants shall be dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.