The defendant had a complaint against the victim who did not have to search the economic infinite ability of the defendant at ordinary times with the victim C(73 years of age).

1. On November 201, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sought the horses from the victim that “picking due to collapse,” while making a dispute with the victim, and suffered injury, such as the escape of a correction body on both sides of the number of treatment days, when considering the victim’s face on several occasions, the Defendant took care of the victim’s face.

2. At around 23:40 on January 16, 2013, the Defendant, at the inside of the victim’s house as stated in the above paragraph (1), inflicted injury on the victim, such as an eancy and spawn fever, which requires treatment for about 42 days, on the one hand, due to the fact that the victim was locked on the right side of the victim due to the aforementioned complaints against the ordinary victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of an injury diagnosis certificate and diagnostic certificate;

1. Article 257 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the sentencing reasons under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act include the victim's inside and outside of the body of correction, etc., the degree of injury to the victim is heavy. The victim's demand that the victim go at home because the victim's failure to check the defendant's happiness cannot be deemed to be more severe due to the victim's negligence. The defendant's disadvantageous circumstances, such as the obstruction of performance of official duties, violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, three times of suspended execution due to violence, etc., and several times of fines due to violence, etc., and the fact that the defendant committed each act of this case in a state that the defendant has not been suffering from economic difficulty and is against the defendant's age, family environment, and this case's age.