beta
(영문) 대법원 2016.12.29 2016도17296

업무방해등

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

In this case that does not constitute a requisite attorney-at-law case, the court below tried and sentenced the defendant without the appointment of a public defender.

Even if the defendant's right to assistance of counsel is violated, the defendant's right to assistance of counsel cannot be considered

The ground of appeal that the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the appointment of state appointed defense counsel is without merit.

Therefore, by the assent of all participating Justices, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.