(영문) 대법원 2016.12.29 2016도17296
업무방해등
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
In this case that does not constitute a requisite attorney-at-law case, the court below tried and sentenced the defendant without the appointment of a public defender.
Even if the defendant's right to assistance of counsel is violated, the defendant's right to assistance of counsel cannot be considered
The ground of appeal that the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the appointment of state appointed defense counsel is without merit.
Therefore, by the assent of all participating Justices, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.