A. The Defendant is the business owner who operates F in Daegu-gun Group E and the non-party Hem G (hereinafter “the deceased”) work in F from June 30, 2003, and the Plaintiff’s wife, Plaintiff B, and C are the deceased’s children.

B. At around 17:10 on December 21, 2015, the Deceased, while carrying the room located in the drum of the sports games (the drum and sn beamline installed and then sniffing the room), she was running the sniff to the sniff at the sniff of the sports games, resulting in the death of the head part at the floor when she siffs down several times with the sniff at the snife with the sniff.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). 【No dispute exists, entry in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 17, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In full view of the statements and images of evidence Nos. 5-1 to 4, 12-17 as well as the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the accident in this case, since the business owner who installs and manages a static competition in danger of safety accidents, and has a cover on the part of the machinery operated by the power, which might cause workers to face danger, such as a power sprink, etc., and even if the machinery operated by the power has a duty of care to require the worker concerned to wear work clothes appropriate for sprinkling work, it is not equipped with a cover, etc., but caused the death of the deceased by occupational negligence, which did not require the decedent to wear work uniforms suitable for sprinkling work.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the evidence duly admitted prior to the limitation of liability, the deceased, who carried the room at the drum to the sn beamline, was also at the snife of the sports.