2. Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won.

On May 15, 2015, at around 11:50, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim and the victim in front of the meeting room, such as the victim F (57 years old) in the E meeting room located in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) and (c) voluntarily prepared documents for the meeting; and (d) prevented the victim from doing so, the victim and the victim were fighting in front of the meeting room; and (c) subsequently, the victim was knifeed from the defect that the victim tried to resist, and then the victim was knife from the said stairs, thereby causing damage to the victim by assaulting the victim, which goes beyond vadi that caused the damage to the left-class salt and the knife that needs to be treated for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning each of the police suspects against the accused, G, H, and I;

1. Each police statement made against the defendant or F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of CCTV image photographs and CCTV image CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 262, 260, and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (Optional to a penalty) concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are confined in a workhouse

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that there was no causal relationship between the Defendant’s act and the injury of this case, or there was no likelihood of predicting the result of the injury.

The following circumstances can be duly admitted and examined by the evidence: (i) the Defendant fighting the body on the stairs in order to bring the victim a work implementation plan (or inside) to the victim, and the victim was frighten from the stairs on the part of the victim who gets out of the stairs in order to get out of the stairs; (ii) the victim was under the diagnosis of the injury in this case on the following day; and (iii) the victim was under the movement of the stairs.