On November 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00:25, at the house of the 3rd floor victim D (the 52 years of age, n, n, fest) of the 3rd floor victim D (the 52 years of age, the Defendant: (b) "at the time of death of the victim"; (c) "at the port hand, the victim's knife of the victim's knife with the left hand, and 2-3 times of drinking, 2-3 times of drinking, 2-3 times of drinking, and the part of drinking part of the victim's knife, which was placed on the television, caused the victim's injury, such as brain salute, which requires treatment for about three weeks, to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police about D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and reasons for sentencing under Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act of the option of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to seven years; and

2. Type 1 (General Bodily Inflicting Persons): Reduction element: In cases where punishment is not imposed (including a serious effort to recover damage) or a considerable part of damage is recovered from the range of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines: where a person commits a crime by force of an organization or a large number of people, or commits a crime by carrying a deadly weapon or other dangerous articles (except in cases where the crime of habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury is applicable); [the decision on the recommended area] Basic area [the scope of recommended area] from April to one year and six months [the general person] mitigated element: serious reflective element;

3. Determination of sentence: A favorable condition is that the defendant in April of imprisonment for the crime in this case committed the crime in this case and against his mistake, and that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant at a price of the head of the victim who is a female victim and caused the bodily injury requiring three-way medical treatment to the victim.