도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a rocketing motor vehicle(s).
At around 20:10 on August 13, 2015, the Defendant continued three lanes between the front roads of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D in front of the new village street from the new village street bank.
Since there was a car driving in the same direction at the fourth-lane of the driving direction, in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to keep the vehicle accurately and to prevent the accident by keeping the traffic situation of the front and rear left well.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and continued to enter the four-lanes, which led to the negligence of entering the right-hand side of the defendant's vehicle, and the part of the victim E(33 years old)'s driver's car's driving is shocked into the left-hand door of the victim E(33 years old).
Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop the vehicle to the extent of 1,047,363 won, such as the exchange of the victim’s motor vehicle left side due to such occupational negligence and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as the removal of traffic interference.
2. On August 13, 2013, the Defendant was in the position of the traffic survey department office at the 183 Mapo Police Station as Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, and was under the control of the head of Mapo Police Station, who conducted the investigation at the time when the Defendant was able to take a bath to the employees G of the above victim E at the scene of the insurance company, and was under the control of the head of the traffic survey department at the time of the investigation.
As above, the Defendant assaulted the right side of H one time to the right side of his own drinking, such as the Defendant’s assaulting the right side of H one time to the right side.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic accident investigation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement of E, H and G;
1. Reports on traffic accidents and reports on occurrence of traffic accidents;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;
1. Criminal facts;