8.20.corries;

3. Even though he participated in the 27th century as a fraternity and received the fraternity, he did not pay the fraternity amounting to KRW 35 million in total, and he did not borrow KRW 10 million on December 15, 2015 and KRW 10 million on August 8, 2016.

2. Determination

A. The plaintiff submitted a judgment as to the claim for the deposit money

6. Although the list of the 20.00000000s includes the 20.20.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

8.20.Written engineering;

3. Each entry in the list of the members of the 27th fraternity (Evidence No. 1-2 and 5 of the Evidence No. 1-2 of the above), in light of the fact that only “G”, and “F,” along with the mobile phone numbers of the above C ( even based on the plaintiff’s preparatory document dated May 21, 2018, referred to “F” or “G” refers to “B” or “G”) is insufficient to recognize the fact that the plaintiff’s members of the above community are not C, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant did not pay the deposit amount is without merit.

B. In full view of the respective descriptions and arguments as stated in Gap's evidence Nos. 3, 4, 19, 20, and Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3 as to the claim for a loan, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff extended a total of KRW 20 million by deducting the amount of KRW 500,000,000 from the amount of KRW 1,000,000,000,000,000 from the amount of KRW 1,000,000 on August 8, 2016, and paying the amount of KRW 9,000,000,000,000 to the defendant. However, if the interest exceeding the maximum interest rate under the Interest Limitation Act was paid at will, the amount equivalent to the excess interest paid should be appropriated for the principal, and if the interest was deducted in advance by the debtor, the amount of the credit actually