beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.16 2014고단1492

폭행등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 22, 2013, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu Seoul, sent alcohol in combination with four persons, including victims E (the age of 23).

The Defendant discovered a victim from a toilet while smoking in a smoking room and returning tobacco to a place, and committed an indecent act by inducing the victim by hand.

2. At around 23:00 on the same day, the Defendant committed an assault against the victim’s body by inserting the beer’s body, which was located in the beer her own fright, in order to threaten the sexual intercourse with the victim, etc. who fright together with the victim, who frighted in the foregoing D, while drinking alcohol, in order to threaten the female by entering the beer fright, which occurred in the beer her own frightum, into the head of the victim who was sitting in the beer frightum and the beer frightum.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of each fine concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion on the Defendant’s assertion of Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order is alleged to the effect that, under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime, the Defendant was in a state of mental or physical disability or mental disability. Thus, according to the above evidence, the Defendant was found to have drinking at the time of the instant crime, but was found to have

Since it seems that it did not seem to have reached a state or weak, the above assertion is rejected.

Where a conviction becomes final and conclusive on the criminal facts in the judgment that are subject to registration and submission of personal information, the accused is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc