beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.07.11 2017나204033

채무부존재확인

Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the counterclaim that the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) added or expanded by this court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the basic facts is as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition and modification as follows. Thus, this part of the basic facts is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil

On October 23, 2015, the first instance judgment: (a) revised the “original contract” of the 19th 19th 19th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 21st 2nd 2nd 201st 2nd 2nd 3rd 201st 1st 2015; (b) the Defendant changed the insured from the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. to the “Defendant”; (c) the insurance amount of KRW 193,175,050 from October 15, 2015 to January 29, 2016 to the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd.; (d) the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd.’s implementation of the first 191,00,000,000 won to the “instant original contract”; (d) the Defendant’s additional performance of the first 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 2nd 2015 to the “Defendant”; and (d) the Defendant’s additional performance of the first 4th 2nd 15th 1st 201st 1st 20.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff (1) requested the Defendant to pay the intermediate payment upon completing materials storage and work preparation in accordance with the instant contract, but the Defendant did not pay the intermediate payment.

(2) The instant contract is a contract for the manufacture and installation of a portable toilet containing liquid microorganisms in a military area where access is restricted.