beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.11.27 2015노1083

사기등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The defendant 62,00,000 won to G who applied for compensation, and 160,000 to J who applied for compensation.

Reasons

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed each of the crimes in this case with a view to recognizing the entirety of each of the crimes in this case and understanding his mistake.

In addition, the period of the defendant's operation of the game of this case (3 days) is relatively short, and it seems that the defendant's actual profit was not significant.

In addition, each crime of fraud of this case seems to have been committed by the defendant while getting back to a large number of debts, and it seems that the defendant was committed against him. The defendant did not want to be punished by the victim M of the crime of fraud. The victim of the crime of fraud of this case did not want to be punished by the above victim, some of the money was paid to the victims of other crime of fraud. There was no record punished by the same crime before the crime of this case. It was only the fact that there was no record of punishment by the same crime of this case, and was punished by a fine of four times for other crimes, elderly mother(80), wife and children are the most likely to support them, since they have construction technology outside the building, and therefore, they are plans to support their families by faithfully working in the future after release.

However, the crime of this case is committed in collusion with the above defendants E and B, and at the same time, the defendant conducts a speculative act using a speculative machine and conducts a business of exchanging tangible and intangible results acquired through the use of game products, and, even if the defendant borrows money from the victims, the victims are unaware of the total amount of 463 million won by deceiving the victims even though they did not have the intent or ability to repay the money, and therefore, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the victims of the total amount of 463 million won from the victims.

Furthermore, the defendant has committed frauds mainly against alumnis or worships, and has yet to be punished.