Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Around 13:00 on May 9, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E (magaltho-galtho-gu) that “The Defendant would purchase the galtho-galtho-gu mobile phone at a 30-month rate.”

However, as the defendant was in a state where approximately 3.6 million won mobile phone charges were unpaid, the defendant was unable to open the mobile phone, and there was no intention or ability to pay the mobile phone prices.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained a delivery of one unit of gallonian mobile phone terminal in a amount of 1,167,000 won (explosive cost) at a market price from the complainant who believed that it is true, and acquired it by deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A complaint;

1. An application for mobile phone entry;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to subscription fees for mobile communications;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;