2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. According to the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese Occupation Period, E, which had the domicile in the same Ri, was written as of October 17, 1911 (No. 44 years of Japan’s Head Office). < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 1929, Oct. 17, 1911; Presidential Decree No. 20220, Oct. 17, 191>

B. Land No. 1 in the annexed list No. 2 and 3 in the land of this case through conversion into the area unit, change of land category, and reorganization of administrative districts, and land No. 2 and 3 in the annexed list No. 2 in the land of this case, and land No. 4 in the annexed list No. 3 in the same list was divided (hereinafter

At the time of the above circumstances, F, the Plaintiff’s prior domicile in Gyeonggi-gun G at the time of the death of November 19, 1918, the F, under the former customary law, succeeded to F’s property solely by his/her grandchildren and family heir. On October 14, 1951, H, a female heir and family heir, inherited H’s property solely in accordance with the former customary law at the time, and as I died on April 17, 1967, the Plaintiff, one of his/her children and family heir, succeeded to H’s property solely.

Attached Form

The register and cadastral record of each land entered in the list were entirely destroyed in the column 625, and the owner column of each land listed in the separate sheet prepared before the enforcement of the Cadastral Act, which was amended by Act No. 2801 on December 31, 1975, was still registered as the owner, but the current landowner column of each land listed in the separate sheet prepared thereafter is registered as the land to restore the landowner pursuant to Article 74 of the Act on the Establishment, Management, etc. of Spatial Data, and the unregistered state is unregistered.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1-4, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 4-1-3, 5, 6, and Gap evidence 5-8, and all pleadings.