2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. The Plaintiff is a non-profit corporation that manages and operates health insurance for the prevention, diagnosis, and rehabilitation of the disease and injury of the citizens, for childbirth and death, and for the improvement of health. The Defendant is a person who operates a discount horse for the sale of various dry products, such as d'D', and B, a person who takes overall charge of food materials management in the relevant marina, and E is a health insurance policyholder conducted by the Plaintiff.

B. At around 17:50 on October 18, 201, B, for the purpose of catching saw that dried water was dried in the Maart, which was previously purchased by the Defendant’s instruction, left in the brush breed breed brep, which was a highly toxic agricultural chemical of nives, and left in the Maart store. On October 19, 2011, B was placed in the vicinity of the waste collection site by ordering the subordinate F of nit around 06:50, and at around October 16:50, 201, E, who is an employee of the Maart, discovered the nit nit fre in the above pesticide, and took in the ebreco (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. As a result of the instant accident, E died on October 25, 201, while hospitalized in G hospital due to a carbatype (highly toxic), and died on October 25, 201. From October 19, 2011 to October 25, 2011, the Plaintiff paid KRW 4,118,840, excluding KRW 1,183,520, out of the total medical expenses incurred during the period of hospitalization of the said E, excluding KRW 5,302,360, out of the total medical expenses incurred during the said period of hospitalization. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23503, Nov. 22, 2011>

As to the instant accident, the Defendant and B were indicted by the Jeonju District Court 2012 Godan1151, and sentenced on October 25, 2012 to a suspended sentence of two years from each of the above courts on August 25, 2012, and the Prosecutor appealed, but the said judgment became final and conclusive due to the dismissal of the appeal.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above-mentioned facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the accident of this case between the defendant and B increases.