However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 1, 2014, at around 21:55, the Defendant reported 112 that he fights on the road in front of the “D restaurant” located in Busan C, and was dispatched to the site, and obstructed with G and trial expenses from F (the age of 36) by a slope victim F (the age of 36) belonging to the Gyeongsan Police Station Escoping Police Station, the Defendant used F to perform a sprinking sprink “a sprink,” and embling the victim F’s chest by hand, and sprinking the sprink “h” to the head of the police box affiliated with the above police box that restrains it.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of reports, and at the same time, the victim F is subject to an inspection by the right side and the left-hand slot in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related to F (including the part of the statement made by H);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] General In the case of obstruction of the performance of official duties (in the case of a person under special jurisdiction, six to two years) [Attachment Decision], the defendant assaults police officers in the course of performing official duties and assaults them to the police officers who are victims, and the nature of the crime is not good. However, the extent of damage is minor, there is no penalty power in addition to fine one time, and there is no other punishment power of the defendant, and the defendant is divided and contradictory to each other, as well as other various circumstances such as the motive, circumstance, means and method of the crime in this case, circumstance before and after the crime, the defendant's age, character and behavior, career, environment, etc. as shown in the argument in this case, the sentence as ordered shall be determined as per Disposition.