If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

The defendant is a resident of the C apartment house in South Yangyang-si, and the victim D (59) is the chairperson of C apartment residents' autonomous council.

Since the injured party disclosed the list of persons who failed to pay management expenses, including the defendant, the defendant had a good appraisal to the injured party.

The Defendant, within the C Apartment Management Office from around 16:00 on September 30, 2016 to 16:30 on the same day, expressed that the victim would have had the head of the Tong attend the meeting of the management office, and expressed that “the victim would have the head of the Tong attend the meeting of the management office.”

C. Whether he is qualified as Monson

For about 20 minutes of disturbance, the victim’s management office operation was obstructed by force by avoiding disturbances for about 20 minutes by continuing the victim who tried to avoid or avoid it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A report on investigation (a wooden currency);

1. The application of statutes to increase the number and the contract status, C apartment identification number to the transferor of the C apartment management affairs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, method and form of crime, the degree of participation in the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime is committed; and (b) the punishment is determined as ordered by taking account of the following circumstances:

- The crime of interference with the instant work is committed on the following day of September 29, 2016, which was sentenced to a fine for the same kind of offense and for the same kind of offense of interference with the work, provided that the degree of serious reflectivity and interference with the work is not serious: