However, with respect to the defendant HS, this ruling shall be above two years from the date of confirmation of this ruling.

"2014 Highest 4722"

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct: on September 2013, in the information and communications office located in Incheon Southern-gu, Incheon, the Defendant forged official document, the head of Qu team, having the Defendant and the Defendant use a photographic photo of the East-gu Incheon, and requested Qu team leader to forge his/her resident registration certificate to forge his/her resident registration certificate, and attached the Defendant’s photograph in his/her resident registration certificate photograph, and attached the Defendant’s photograph in his/her East-gu HS to IJ and IK resident registration certificate photo.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the IK resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, IM under the name of the head of Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, IJ under the name of the head of Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and IK resident registration certificate under the name of Seocheon-do, Gyeonggi-do.

2. Defendants’ public offering of forged public document: around December 19, 2013, the Defendants conspired to open a cell phone at the cell of a mobile phone in the Mapo-siIN on the Mapo-si. The Defendants presented to IMO as if the above resident registration certificate was duly formed, and exercised four copies of the forged public document registration certificates over six times in total, as shown in the list of crimes, from around that time to January 10, 2014.

3. Defendants and IP-related conspiracys

A. On December 19, 2013, the Defendants conspired with IP on the fabrication of private documents and the display of the falsified document, and subsequently, at the mobile phone store which is a mobile phone owned by the AL in the military, arbitrarily recorded the IL’s personal information in the column for the applicant for the mobile phone subscription without the IL’s consent, and subsequently forged one copy of the application for the mobile phone subscription under the above IL, which is a private document related to rights and duties, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the said IL’s signature on the name side, and subsequently, submitted it to the IO as if the said application for subscription was duly established.

In addition, the Defendants are IP.