A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, by a fine of five thousand won,00,000 won.

However, the defendant A.

1. Defendant A is a person who runs the business of manufacturing plastic products with the trade name of “B” corporation in Daegu-gun District Operations D.

No person shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, on November 1, 2016, the Defendant employed 11 foreigners who did not have the status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities, such as the list of crimes, from around November 1, 2016 to February 1, 2017, as manufacturing process staff, as well as who did not have the status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities, such as the list of crimes.

2. The Defendant Company B, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), employed 11 foreigners who were the representative director of the Defendant, did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, thereby violating the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each E, etc. statement;

1. An inquiry into the written accusation, a written notice of decision on examining an immigration offender, a list of illegal foreigners, a written confirmation on employment of each alien, and a comprehensive record of each immigration offender;

1. Application of business registration certificate, certified copy of corporate registry;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Articles 94 subparag. 9 and 18 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act, and the choice of imprisonment

(b) Defendant B stock company: Articles 99-3 subparag. 2, 94 subparag. 9, and 18 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A with suspended execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the Defendant reflects his depth while recognizing the crime, the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the same criminal history or fine, and there are some circumstances to consider certain parts of the circumstances leading to the instant crime, such as the change in the location of B stock company, and the period during which the Defendant has operated the Defendant’s age and B stock company.