A. B was engaged in a general automobile transport business under the trade name, such as C, D, E, and F from October 1, 2008 to March 20, 2013, and the head of the Si/Gun/Gu has notified 1,94,00 won for value-added tax 1 on December 31, 2010 by the head of the Si/Gun/Gu, and 10,208,60 won for value-added tax, including value-added tax on October 25, 2010, and the details of national taxes under B were as follows: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 22426, Nov. 30, 2010; Presidential Decree No. 22426, Oct. 25, 2010>

(hereinafter “instant taxation claim”). B.

B On July 8, 1985, the Defendant reported marriage with the Defendant on July 8, 1985, and on November 8, 201, the Defendant reported divorce with the Defendant.

C. On December 2, 2011, B entered into a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the Defendant with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt of the Changwon District Court Kim Sea Registry on December 15, 201.

At the time of the instant sales contract, the instant real estate was the only real estate of B, and B was in excess of its obligation.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 6 (if there is an additional number, including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Defendant’s judgment on the instant safety defense is that B exceeded the real estate of this case on December 15, 201 and paid acquisition tax, education tax, etc. to the competent agency related to the instant real estate at that time. As such, the Plaintiff ought to be deemed to have been aware of the fact that the instant real estate was transferred from B, and the instant lawsuit filed on July 29, 2013, which was one year after the date, raised on July 29, 2013, which was the one year thereafter, defenses that the exclusion period is excessive and unlawful

A lawsuit of revocation by a creditor shall be brought within one year from the date on which the creditor becomes aware of the cause for revocation (Article 406(2) of the Civil Act), and the creditor, which is the starting point for the period of exclusion in exercising the right of revocation.