2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case as well as committed the crime of this case in depth, and made the defendant live faithfully without reoffending in the future, and that the mother's health is not good.

However, the Defendant had been punished several times since 2001, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for robbery and three years and six months on November 28, 2008, and released from prison to prison for the crime of robbery, which resulted in the instant crime in the same way as before and in the same way as before, even though he was during the period of repeated crime, even though he was subject to a request from an investigative agency for appearance with respect to the instant crime, was stolen even after he was asked from the investigative agency, was not agreed with the victim, and was not even recovered from part of the damage, and all other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to the instant crime, and circumstances leading to the instant crime, etc., are considered as a whole, and thus, the lower court’s punishment is too appropriate and unreasonable.

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.