If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

[2016 High Court Decision 808]

1. Joint crime B with B is a D’s husband’s wife, which was recorded as the owner of the studio Cudio-gu Seoul in the previous city in the previous city, and the Defendant is the lessor of the above studio, and the Defendant is the person who intends to rent the above 304 building.

Upon around April 21, 2014, the Defendant and B entered the lease contract with the Defendant as the deposit amount of KRW 35 million in order to have the Defendant obtain more loans from the bank even though the lease deposit amount was KRW 25 million, and the Defendant and B entered the lease contract with the Defendant as the deposit amount of KRW 35 million in the name of the former city, the lease deposit amount of KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00,00.

As a result, the defendant and B forged one copy of the lease agreement in the name of I, which is a private document on the proof of the fact as if he/she was the witness in preparing the lease agreement by a certified intermediary K without authority for the purpose of exercising the right in collusion.

2. Single-use;

A. On July 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) borrowed KRW 10,00,000 to L in front of Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seojin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; and (b) delivered the lease agreement forged as referred to in paragraph 1(a) as if it was duly formed as a collateral and exercised the said agreement.

B. On July 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was in front of Seojin-gu, Seoul; and (b) was in fact a contract under which the lease agreement under 304 was forged; and (c) unlike the amount of the deposit stated in the contract, the actual deposit amount was KRW 25 million; and (d) was in fact in our bank as security, KRW 10 million.