A. As to KRW 20,628,00 among the above money and KRW 532,478,560, Defendant C, from July 28, 2010, and KRW 13,00. < Amended by Act No. 4393, Jan. 2, 2091>

A. On August 2009, the Plaintiff, a company processing steel bars, etc., entered into a service contract with Samsung C&T Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “T&T”) that is a company conducting a comprehensive construction project, with a view to processing services for steel bars of F section, underground tea structure (excluding value added tax) among the construction works on the first line of the national highways for the multifunctional administrative city contracted by the Korea Land and Housing Corporation by Samsung C&T, which was contracted by the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, with a service cost of KRW 1,098,00,000 (excluding value added tax) and conducting from August 2009 to November 2011.

(hereinafter “instant service contract”). According to the above contract, the Plaintiff’s construction of a processing plant at the above construction site and the steel bars brought in from Samsung C&T shall be processed in accordance with the design drawing presented by Samsung C&T, and Samsung C&T shall pay the Plaintiff the service cost in return for the processing service.

B. On January 13, 2012, Defendant C and Defendant D, registered as the Plaintiff’s employee, who was a subcontractor for the instant service contract from the Plaintiff at the construction site under the name of “G”, was convicted of the crime of special larceny with the content that “from July 28, 2010 to July 19, 2011, the Plaintiff’s representative director, who was located in a steel processing plant with mutual collaboration, was found to have been convicted of the criminal facts of this case by means of theft, with the knowledge of the fact that “the Defendant acquired the goods of this case,” as indicated in the attached list of crimes committed by the Plaintiff’s representative director, who was located in the steel processing plant 17 times more than 17 times in total, as in the attached list of crimes committed.” The Defendant C purchased the goods of this case with the knowledge of the fact that “the goods of this case was acquired and sold to Defendant B.”

Since the Daejeon District Court 201Kadan4852, only Defendant C appealed appealed against the above judgment, but the Daejeon District Court.