If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant is an operator of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Party B. The Defendant is prohibited from providing game products that have not been classified for distribution or use, and from converting, exchanging, arranging exchange, or re-purchasing tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game products. Nevertheless, from July 2012 to October 4, 2012, the Defendant provided 10,000 won to the above-mentioned Party B’s game using the game in exchange for the purpose of business. Nevertheless, the Defendant provided 10,000 won to the above-mentioned Party’s game using the game in exchange for 10,000 won if many unspecified customers who directly use the Party’s game in exchange for the purpose of using the game in exchange for the purpose of using the game, and the Defendant provided 10,000 won to the above Party’s game in exchange for the purpose of using the game in exchange for the purpose of 10,000 won or more, and if the number of customers who directly use the Party’s game in exchange for the purpose of 50, the said Party’s.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified by the Game Rating Board for use, and exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (field conditions, game products “Meatry” and statements)

1. Relevant Article of facts constituting a crime, Article 44 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Game Industry and the Promotion of Punishment, Article 32 (1) 1 of the Act (the point of using and providing game products classified as the rating classification), Article 44 (1) 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act;