If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 02:20 on September 4, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, on the front of the Dwork points located in Ansan-gu, Seoul. At around 02:20, when the Defendant was under the influence of the victim E (the 53 years of age) of the taxi passenger, and at the end, expressed the complaint that he did not drive the taxi on his own route, he would be able to cover with the Defendant’s vision and with his hand when the Defendant was satisfed, and when the victim’s face, etc. was satisfed, the Defendant satisfed the victim’s fat, and batd the victim’s shoulder.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the second protocol of trial;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Some statements in the police statement of E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of photograph of suspects;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the defendant does not constitute a crime merely because he takes bridges for the purpose of defending the victim's unilateral attack.

In ordinary, even if one party's act is deemed to be a legitimate act for defense or a self-defense when one party seems to be in appearance, if one party unilaterally commits an unlawful attack and the other party exercises a tangible power as a resistance to protect himself/herself and escape from such unlawful attack, unless the act does not go beyond the limit of passive defense, the situation leading up to the act, unless it goes beyond the limit of passive defense.