특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On February 5, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from hazardous driving) driving, around 18:40, while under the influence of alcohol three-lanes of the five-lane road of D gas stations located in C in C, the Defendant driven the E Car Nos. 2 in the direction of the T Car No. 2 in the direction of the Trop distance.
In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle and prevent the accident.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant 17 tons of G 17 tons of wing truck truck truck truck truck, which was driven by the Defendant’s negligence and was driven by the Defendant, in the front direction of the passenger car.
Ultimately, the Defendant driven the said car in a state where it is difficult to drive the car normally due to influence of drinking, resulting in injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.
2. On February 5, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) sent back to the I Hospital located in H at the 119 first-aid vehicle around 18:53 on the same day after having paid the traffic accident as above on the roads indicated in paragraph 1 of around 18:48, as seen above.
On February 5, 2018, the Defendant driven an emergency hospital at the immediately preceding I Hospital on February 19:27, 2018, while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling and smelling the Defendant from a slope K belonging to the JJJK, to the face, etc.
There are reasonable grounds to recognize that the above police officers were required to respond to the drinking test by inserting about 10 minutes into a drinking measuring instrument five times between the above police officers.
Nevertheless, the defendant avoided this and did not comply with a police officer's request for a measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) (1. (2).