However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 12:50 on January 23, 2014, the Defendant brought the victim E (the age of 43) who had talked with another person in the public toilets in the D market located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and brought the victim E (the age of 43), who had talked with another person, with a view to hump (proof No. 1) that is a dangerous object, to bring the victim's head into a single room where the number of days of treatment cannot be known to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Photographs;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes to one seized network (No. 1);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act / [the scope of recommending sentence] : The scope of sentence compared to the sentencing sentence and the recommended sentence in the mitigated area (one year and six months to two years) (including efforts to recover damage), the mitigated area (one year and six months to six months), or where considerable damage has been recovered, the mitigated area (including special mitigation), or the mitigated area: within the scope of sentence between one year and six months (decision of sentencing) and one year and six months (decision of sentence) and one year and six months, and the execution of the sentence shall be suspended for a certain period of one year and six months;

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.