F, around 10:45 on April 9, 2016, the G Poter cargo (hereinafter “instant cargo”) was driven by the G Poter and continued to run from the boundary of the lux village of the Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, to the boundary of the lux.

At the time, the place was a yellow solid line, which was one-lane in the center line. The F, in order to overtake the I TT 100 Oral Sea (hereinafter “the instant Oral Sea”) of the network H driving that was proceeding along the same lane, was going beyond the center line of the yellow solid lines and going beyond the opposite lane, and again, entered the previous running line, the left hand of the Oral Sea of this case was shocked in front of the right-hand side of the instant cargo vehicle, and caused H to go beyond the bottom.

As a result, the network H died on April 10, 2016, on the grounds of respiratory and heart charging around 00:29.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

A, C, D, and E, the heir of the network H, who is the wife, B, and the guardian who is the child.

C. The defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with F in relation to the instant cargo vehicle.

2. Determination

A. (1) In the event of the change of the vehicle line, the driver of the ground for liability has an occupational duty to not overtake the road in the center line with yellow solid lines, and there is an occupational duty to secure and drive a side or rear vehicle and safety distance. According to the above facts, F caused the instant accident by negligence in breach of the above duty of care. The Defendant, as the insurer of F, has a duty to compensate for the damages caused by the instant accident to the heir of the deceased H as the victim. (2) However, the Defendant is liable to compensate for the damages caused by the instant accident.