However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the same-sex disorder, etc.

1. On March 21, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 14:22 on March 21, 2020, 14:2, the thief of the victim B, which was placed in the first floor of the 12,900 won of the market managed by the victim B in the Gama-si Ga-si Market ( Denmark), was stolen.

2. On March 21, 2020, on March 21, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 14:25, 2020; (b) around 14:25, at the place indicated in paragraph (1); (c) around 54,00 of the market price managed by the victim D; (d) one of the tronomal agents of “hina” worth KRW 109,000 in the market price, which included one of the tronomal agents of KRW 163,00 in the future bank; and (e) stolen the property of KRW 163,00 in total in the market price.

3. On March 31, 2020, around 17:18, 2020, the Defendant, at the places indicated in paragraph (1) around Mar. 31, 2020, stolen: (a) placed two nutritions of “Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhnnnnn

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the total amount of KRW 393,900 on three occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the accused’s legal statement B and each written investigation report (the details of the receipt of the report, CCTV investigation) to the seized list, seized articles and photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of a sentence, and the mitigation of

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is suspended;

1. Circumstances favorable to the defendant for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act shall be as follows:

The defendant is divided and reflected in each of the crimes in this case.

The defendant committed each of the crimes in this case under the state of mental disability.

The value of stolen goods by the defendant is relatively small.

Criminal facts in the judgment were returned to the victim, and criminal facts No. 2 and No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant.