C The representative director of D (hereinafter referred to as “D”) and E are the representative director of D, F, and G (hereinafter referred to as “G”) were the directors of D, who were in the position of D’s “general meeting leader,” and the Defendant was aware of the receipt of C and E through G. Meanwhile, as the actual operator of the victim K, the victim J Co., Ltd., the victim J Co., Ltd., and the Defendant was aware of the fact at the time of subcontracting.

C, E, even though there is little possibility that it would receive remodeling works for the hotel M in Ma Ma in D and F, it introduced a business as if it could bring high profits by ordering construction works, and requested the Defendant and G to raise funds. Accordingly, the Defendant and G introduced investors to C and E and received some of them as commission fees.

1. The Defendant, on January 10, 201, committed fraud against the Victim KK Co., Ltd., the Defendant met I at an O hotel coffee shop located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and I performs road construction and hotel business in Uzbekistan.

The above companies are entitled to receive various projects in Uzbekistan and have all conditions, and the amount to be used as advance payments and work promotion expenses has changed to KRW 200 million as the fund has been used.B, trusting and not be aware of it, and there is a difference in lending. It is expected that Uzbekistan will receive a lot of construction works such as road works, etc., and that J will create conditions so that it may receive a subcontract in the future.

“.........”

However, even if C and E borrow money from Defendant I through Defendant I, it was thought that it will be used as a closed office rent and management fee for several months, and D.