If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On May 22, 2019, the Defendant received a proposal stating that he would give a loan if he sent a physical card from a person who was not the name of the Defendant. On the same day, the Defendant sent one physical card connected to the account of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant in the name of the bank (B) in the vicinity of the Seoul Metropolitan Government clean Station through Kwikset Service Articles.

As a result, the Defendant promised to lend the means of access to electronic financial transactions in return for the intangible expected profit of receiving a loan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Return on details of remittance and requests for provision of financial transaction information;

1. Application of the Kakao Stockholm Acts and subordinate statutes to the closure of the message conversation.

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 49 (4) 2 and 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;