무고
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not know that the defendant filed a false complaint, but otherwise, the defendant did not appeal C
The court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
The argument is asserted.
2. Determination
A. Around December 2013, the summary of the instant facts charged was prepared by the Defendant, at the Defendant’s home located in a single unit of the members of the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, by using the writing body in the paper.
On September 2, 2013, Defendant C filed a complaint with the public service center of the Changwon District Public Prosecutor's Office located in Sungwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul, on August 10, 201, stating that "the Defendant issued a perjury in the case of injury, etc. by Defendant C at the Changwon District Court located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul." The above complaint by Defendant C is groundless since the Defendant did not have issued a perjury.
The purport of "" is continuous receipt by the public service center of the Masan-dong Police Station located in the Simsan-si, Changwon-si on December 2013, 201, and around that time, under investigation and economic 2 team office, the complainant is investigated by the complainant, and the counsel's "the contents of the confirmation of facts" need to be made by the witness.
G. G. G. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.
D It seems that the work has been prepared anywhere and low, and this decision will be made.
The Defendant’s name, “If written by the person D, if so,” is required to be followed by his/her defense counsel.
The decision to grant “No. 100” to the question “ ......”
“Written reply,” and the counsel’s “written confirmation of facts” is required to have been asked for.
It is well aware of the question “I am.”
Although the part of the testimony given by the Defendant was true, the Defendant’s only complained against the false testimony.
“The statement was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, the fact that there is no fact that E does assault, etc., is written by the defendant, who is the husband, in a mutual influence book for E.