On August 7, 2017, at around 01:06, the Defendant expressed a desire to 112 to a slope D, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report at around 112 while the dispute was brought about due to the issue of taxi drivers B and the taxi rate, at around 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was able to display both drinking and drinking d face; and (b) tried to put D’s face to the hand hack of both fingers; and (c) D was able to put the Defendant’s hand on his hand, and (d) tried to put the Defendant’s hand on his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the laws and regulations on police statements made to B and D;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (the punishment to suspend a sentence: fine of KRW 3 million, detention in a workhouse: KRW 100,000 per day) of the suspended sentence [The following consideration are the primary criminal of the defendant, the confession of the crime of this case and the seriously against the defendant, the contingent crime committed while under the influence of alcohol, and the degree of assault against the police officer is relatively minor, etc.];