교통사고처리특례법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Criminal facts
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-wing cargo vehicle.
On October 9, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on the 12:25th day of October, 2013, and proceeded from the gold price to the tent.
At the same time, the signal was installed and operated normally, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to proceed along the intersection according to the signals of the signal apparatus installed in the front bank.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and conflict with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle at the front part of the Fump truck’s G dump truck, which was under way to turn to the left at the left in accordance with the new code, from the Madum cancer village.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to H (V, 68 years of age) who is the passenger of the Defendant’s vehicle due to the foregoing occupational negligence, such as the right slebrat, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. The witness F, I, and J’s each legal statement and defense counsel, the defendant proceeded on the defendant’s vehicle in accordance with the straight line, and the F’s vehicle driving in violation of the signal and the accident in this case occurred while left at a visible distance.
In light of the F’s investigative agency and this court where the accident of this case occurred due to the Defendant’s vehicle that was in violation of this, and the statement in the investigation agency and this court where the Defendant’s vehicle immediately behind the accident at the time of the accident, the statement in the J’s investigative agency and this court, and the I’s investigative agency where the Defendant vehicle stopped the vehicle in accordance with the red signals in the opposite direction of the vehicle driven by the Defendant vehicle, and the statement in this court, are consistent and consistent with each other, the Defendant violated the signal as stated in the facts charged.