beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.11.16 2017고단2596

위증

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2016, the Defendant appeared at the court No. 406 of the Seoul Western District Court No. 4016, the Seoul Western District Court No. 1552, which was located in Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul, on September 23, 2016, and took an oath as a witness of the injury case No. 1552 G in the above court, and the Defendant assaulted the Defendant.

I did not assault the question "....."

(2) The witness himself/herself was subject to an unilateral assault on the question of “Is that I want to punish the defendant.”

I would like to make a false statement, if you continue to do so, I would like to be punished.

“The testimony was made.”

However, at the time G was injured by the Defendant on March 24, 2015, at the time of the injury of the Defendant on March 24, 2015, there was a fact that at the time of the injury of the Defendant, the Defendant was suffering from the injury of G, such as a non-fashing in need of six weeks of medical treatment, by cutting the body fighting with G, pushing him with the shoulder, walking his face, walking the bridge through a bendro, walking the strings, walking the bridge, and cutting it up.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Each investigation report (No. 11 and No. 14 once a year);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that each injury diagnosis document [the defendant and his defense counsel merely made a statement consistent with their memory and did not make a false statement contrary to memory, and therefore, they do not have perjury.

However, in full view of each of the above evidence, even if the defendant committed an assault by drinking in the course of wrapping with G on March 24, 2015, the defendant testified against objective facts to the effect that he was unilaterally abused from G, and that he did not have any assault, and the defendant testified as above by mistake in the record.

2.3.2