However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-A-hurd motor vehicle.

On February 5, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 18:55, and led to a two-lane road in the 170-lane Kimhae-si, Gimhae-si, to the speed of about 48 km per hour according to the one-lane in the U.S. P. P. P. P. P., the Defendant had been driving the above car at around 18:5.

Since there are no street lamps and there are no surrounding areas, in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely while accurately operating the steering right and the steering gear of the vehicle with the driver's duty of care.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and passed it on the left side of the running direction of the defendant, and the victim D (the age of 46) who crosses the road from the right side of the defendant's driving direction to the right side of the above car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered serious injury due to the above occupational negligence, resulting in uncertainty due to the injury of the head of external wounds, etc. requiring approximately 20 weeks medical treatment, thereby causing danger to life.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, an accident site photograph, a survey report on actual condition, and CCTV images to be cut off and CCTV images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a medical certificate, a medical statement, a criminal investigation report (to listen to the victim's spouse's telephone call), and an investigation report (the confirmation report, such as the current state

1. In full view of various circumstances revealed in the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment without prison labor), including the shape and width of the road in this case, the current status of commercial residential facilities around the site where the accident occurred, and the shock points of the victim, the defendant discovered a victim who crosses the road to the left-hand side of the road by examining the right-hand side of the road and provided an appropriate brake to avoid

by negligence, which violated the duty of care, was the cause of the instant traffic accident.