사기등
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for ten months, for Defendant C and D, for eight months, and for Defendant E.
Punishment of the crime
1. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;
A. On February 21, 2013, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the “J” office for the Defendant’s operation of the 202 building located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu Office; and (b) without authority, at the name column of the electronic files of the certificate of employment that he/she received from the “Y” online without authority to exercise; (c) K, the name of the company in the “J”, the “J”, the “three months” in the period of service; and (d) the senior officer, as of the date of issuance
On February 22, 2013, the J representative Director B entered and printed out it, and then the seal which he had been able to do so in advance.
In addition, from March 12, 2013 to March 12, 2013, the Defendant forged 51 copies of the document, such as the certificate of employment or the statement of salary in the name of another person, which is a private document related to the certification of facts, by the following means.
B. On February 22, 2013, the Defendant on the above investigation documents submitted the following documents: (a) at the Korea Workers’ Compensation & Welfare Service branch of Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu 89 12 Dabong-dong 8912, and (b) via K, to employees under the above Corporation’s name-free circumstances who may not know of such circumstances, (c) applied for a financing of employee living stabilization fund; and (d) as shown in the above paragraph (a), attached a certificate of employment in B’s name and a statement of salary to the above application
In addition, from that time until March 13, 2013, the Defendant submitted a forged private document by submitting a certificate of employment and a detailed statement of wages in 12 times, such as the list of offenses (2) in the attached Form No. 51, which was forged.
2. Defendants’ co-principal conduct
A. The fraud, at the J Office of the operation of Defendant A on the second floor of the building located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, employed Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E as an employee, and had the loan applicants who do not meet the requirements for the qualification for wedding loan of the Labor Life Stabilization Fund of Korea Labor Welfare Corporation.