2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On February 10, 2009, the Defendant and D lent KRW 30 million to E, a worker of entertainment establishments, including KRW 10 million, KRW D 20 million, and KRW 36 million, a sum of KRW 36 million shall be repaid in installments on ten occasions each month from March 10, 2009 to December 12 of the same year between E and E. However, even once the due date is due, if the due date is due, the interest of the due date shall be immediately lost, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 30 percent per annum from the day following the date of loss of the due date for the entire amount due shall be paid.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant loan agreement”) signed between Defendant D and E. B.

Accordingly, on February 10, 2009, the defendant prepared and delivered a notarial deed (No. 130 of the C Office No. 2009 No. 130 of the C Office) to the effect that a notary public does not raise any objection even if he/she is subject to compulsory execution in the event of default on the above loan and joint and several sureties, the creditor, the debtor, the joint and several sureties shall be the plaintiff, and the defendant, E, the joint and several sureties shall be the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment asserted that the plaintiff's joint and several liability agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant is invalid because the plaintiff becomes a joint and several surety in lending money to Eul and the defendant, and the plaintiff becomes a joint and several surety in form is easy to collect the loan, and it constitutes a false and several liability agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.

However, there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the joint and several guarantee contract between the plaintiff and the defendant was based on the false declaration of intention, only the statement of Gap evidence 4 (including the provisional number) and witness D, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.