The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that the charge of this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules

In addition, the argument that the defendant's act constitutes self-defense is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged in the ground for appeal that the defendant did not consider it as the ground for appeal or that the court below did not consider it as an object

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.