A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for four months, respectively.

provided that this judgment has become final and conclusive.

Defendant

A around 00:35 on April 28, 2020, around 00:0:35, the victim was approaching the victim on the ground that he was frighted with the victim E in front of the “D” located in the city of Yagu, Busan, and was frightened by drinking away from the victim, and the victim was frightd with the victim's face.

Defendant

The defendant B, who is the seat of A, was in the course of mashing, was scambling with the victim's hair, scambling the victim's head, and scam the victim's head.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as the felkeel which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Some statements made by the Defendants in each police interrogation protocol

1. Each investigation report of the police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E (for example, analysis of case video and attachment 1, 2 of criminal video CDs) and application of each injury diagnosis document, CD-related statute;

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with labor

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Probation and community service order Defendants: (a) considering the fact that the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (Provided, That probation and probation are limited to Defendant A) of the Criminal Act are the same criminal records to the Defendants; (b) the content and degree of the injury suffered by the victims as a result of the instant crime; and (c) the fact that the victims did not receive a written instruction from the victims, a serious punishment against the Defendants is required.

However, in addition to the reasons and circumstances of the case, the Defendants have shown the attitude of reflectivity while recognizing the responsibility for the crime in this case. For the victim, the Defendant A deposited KRW 2 million, the Defendant B deposited KRW 1 million, the Defendants did not have any record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and the Defendants’ age, character, conduct and environment.