However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, “2017 Highest 2508, 2508,” who works as an employee at a mobile phone sales store C, which is located in the ethic City B, had been kept by obtaining a copy of a driver’s license from D which has been a customer at the above mobile phone sales store, had the intention to open the mobile phone in the name of D.

1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On May 6, 2016, the Defendant opened the instant mobile phone sales store with D’s name without D’s consent, entered D’s name, resident registration number, address, etc. in the column for subscribing to the new contract form for the service with D’s pen, entered D’s name, resident registration number, address, etc. in the customer column, signed as “D” in the customer column, and immediately sent the said document by facsimile as if it was a document that was duly formed to an employee under the jurisdiction of KT, who was aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a new service contract in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it.

B. On July 16, 2016, the Defendant opened the instant mobile phone sales store with D’s name without D’s consent, stated D’s name, resident registration number, address, etc. in the column for subscribing to the new contract form for the service with D’s name, resident registration number, address, etc., stated D’s name in the customer column, signed it in the customer column, and immediately sent the said document by facsimile as if the document was duly formed to an employee under the jurisdiction of KT, who is unaware of such forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a new service contract in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations, and exercised it.

2. Fraud;

A. The Defendant did not obtain the consent of the application for joining the mobile phone from D at the time, place, and fact at the time and place stated in paragraph 1(a), and expressed his intent to pay the price even if the mobile phone is opened.