A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Defendant

A is the representative director of (ju) E in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, from February 7, 2013 to February 27, 2015, and Defendant B was de facto in a de facto marital relationship with Defendant A, and the said (ju) E was actually operated with Defendant A, and the Defendants were in a de facto marital relationship with Defendant A, and were in charge of controlling the operation of the company.

Since the Defendants were managed by the Victim F from the Victim F to the Gcar T-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

Nevertheless, on September 15, 2014, the Defendants violated the above duties and received a loan of KRW 40 million from the Skdong Saemaul Savings Depository and established a mortgage equivalent to KRW 52 million on September 19, 2014 on the loan of KRW 40 million from the victim F. On December 19, 2014, the Defendants took out a loan of KRW 16 million from the KK Savings Bank to the victim H, and took out a loan of KRW 16 million from the KK Savings Bank to the victim H on January 9, 2015, established a mortgage on KRW 16 million on the loan of KRW 50 million from the KK Savings on January 26, 2015, KRW 16 million on the loan of KRW 80,000 on the loan of KRW 80,000 on the loan of KRW 50,000 on the loan of KRW 360,000 on the loan of the victim.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to obtain financial benefits equivalent to KRW 120 million and caused financial damage equivalent to the same amount to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement made to F, J, and H;

1. Each motor vehicle register (ju), (E).