If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person engaging in driving a camping motor vehicle B.

At around 12:00 on November 9, 2019, the Defendant was driving the said car, while driving the said car, and driving the D restaurant, which is located in U.S. Dong-dong C, U.S. into the E Hospital, from the mathro to the math.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by making a U-turn in the section permitted for U-turns and in this case, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front portion of G Otoba driven by the victim F (Nam, 20 years old) who was directly driven by the Defendant in violation of the signal from the center line of the yellow-line E hospital to the white-line due to the negligence of being driven by the Defendant in excess of the center line of the yellow-line, at a point other than the U.S. permitted section.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury on the part of the victim of the foregoing occupational negligence, which caused the injury of the victim to the pulmonary frame and the pulmonary end of the pelpel.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. A video file storage CD in an accident;

1. A survey report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, an accident site photograph (the evidence in the judgment of the court below, such as CCTV at the time of the accident, is sufficiently recognized as a result of the Defendant’s fault. Meanwhile, the Defendant asserts to the effect that his fault ratio was set higher and unjustifiable. However, the establishment of a criminal negligence depends on the existence of negligence, unless otherwise specifically provided, not on the degree or proportion of negligence, but on the basis of the degree or proportion of negligence. Even if it was selected as a claim for sentencing, the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order is deemed appropriate in light of the content and circumstances of the crime, the degree and degree of injury, etc

1. Handling of traffic accidents under relevant Articles of the Act and selective punishment concerning facts constituting an offense;