유족급여 불승인 취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Details of the disposition
On April 1, 2010, the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”), who is the husband of the Plaintiff, was employed as the chief of electric installations in E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun (hereinafter “the instant company”). A contracting party to “F construction works (electric, fire-fighting)” (hereinafter “instant construction works”) from the Korea Basic Science Support Institute around May 201, and around May 23, 201, the instant company was dispatched as the site agent of the instant company at the instant construction site located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and started to work at around that time after being stationed therein.
At around 20:30 on December 7, 201, the Deceased got contact with the Plaintiff by sending text messages stating “I do not seem to be too little, I do not end.” On December 9, 2011, the Deceased was found to be addicted to the U.S. Carbon poisoning in the vicinity of the construction site of this case on the street around December 11:27, 201.
On March 19, 2012, the Plaintiff claimed the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses against the Defendant on the ground that the deceased’s suicide was caused by occupational stress, and thus constitutes occupational accidents. However, on May 10, 2012, the Defendant did not approve the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relationship between the deceased’s death and the work.
(hereinafter “instant disposition”). 【In the absence of any dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 6, Gap evidence 7, and Eul evidence 1 (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the entire argument as to the validity of the instant disposition, and the purport of the entire argument, the deceased, who first worked as a “field agent” at the construction site of this case, was subject to heavy authority and responsibility compared to the previous in the state of field experience or lack of technical capabilities, thereby causing psychological pressure. In the event of the urgency of work and excessive performance, the deceased, etc., was at the place of order manager, etc.