However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 29, 2003, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on June 21, 201, the Seoul Southern District Court issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for the same crime at the Seoul Southern District Court.

On June 17, 2020, at around 22:47, the Defendant driven C C C C in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.110% in the section of approximately 8km from the front side of the Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City to the school route of about 112, Doha-ro 112.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records: Criminal records and other inquiries, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (reports on criminal records and two times before driving a suspect under influence);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing period of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act includes the defendant's records of the same crime, blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case, the circumstances leading to the drunk driving, the distance and place where the defendant was drunk driving, and the fact that the defendant is divided into his mistake, and other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, shall be determined as ordered.